How adequate was the nature of legal guardianship in the presented case on Savings and Loan Violations discussed in chapter 8 of Schlegel & Weisburd text? How well did law serve in the guardianship against behaviors and activities presented in the Space Shuttle Challenger Explosion in Chapter 9 of Schlegel & Weisburd text? Would more formal criminal law have provided better guardianship and thus have helped to prevent the Securities Violations and Compliance Practices summarized in chapter 10 of Schlegel & Weisburd text?
The reference for the above articles is: Schlegel, K., Weisburd, D. (1992). White-Collar Crime Reconsidered. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.