Program Evaluation Capstone Project

Annotated Bibliography Entries 2–12
In this assignment, you will compile your bibliography entries and add more articles or chapters about adult education until you have a total of 12.
Develop a detailed annotation for each of the sources, following principles you learned in your exploration of Capella library resources. The annotation for each (which is to be written in current APA format) should include:
• A 100–300-word synopsis of each article or chapter that answers questions 1–8 on page 13 of your Critical Thinking text.
• A detailed statement of how you see each article or chapter as being useful in the development of your doctoral dissertation or capstone project.
As described in Unit 2, ask yourself these questions before including a source:
• Is the source no older than 7 years?
• If it is older than 7 years, is it a seminal source?
• If it is a seminal source, have you clearly explained in the annotation how it meets that designation?
• Is it a peer-reviewed journal or book chapter?
• If it is not a peer-reviewed journal or book chapter, can you locate the content in a peer-reviewed journal or book chapter?
• If you cannot locate the content in a peer-reviewed journal or book chapter, have you clearly stated in the annotation why the information is critically important?
 You may not use an entire book for an annotation, although you can use individual chapters of a book.
• Have you noted whether the resource is primary, secondary, or tertiary?
Be sure to use the current APA style and formatting.

References

About HUD’s Headquarters Building. (2021). Retrieved from https://www.hud.gov/about/hqbuilding
Browne-Ferrigno, T., & Muth. R. (2012). Call for research on candidates in leadership preparation programs. Planning & Changing, 43(1/2), 10-24. Retrieved from https://www-proquest-com.library.capella.edu/docview/1506941066?pq-origsite=summon
Center for Leadership Development. (2021). Retrieved from https://leadership.opm.gov/programs.aspx?course=184
Davies, R. (2015). Evaluability Assessment. BetterEvaluation. Retrieved from https://www.betterevaluation.org/themes/evaluability_assessment
Federal Emerging Leaders Development (FELD)Program. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://kansascity.feb.gov/federal-emerging-leaders-development-feldprogram/#:~:text=The%20Federal%20Emerging%20Leaders%20Development%20%28FELD%29%20Program%20is,speaking%20skills%2C%20share%20information%20and%20explore%20unique%20challenges.
Hesbol, K. A. (2012). learning to lead: An examination of innovative principal leadership preparation practices. Planning and Changing, 43(1), 3-9. Retrieved from http://library.capella.edu/login?qurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.proquest.com%2Fscholarly-journals%2Flearning-lead-examination-innovative-principal%2Fdocview%2F1506941010%2Fse-2%3Faccountid%3D27965
Huang, T., Beachum, F. D., White, G. P., Kaimal, G., FitzGerald, A. M., & Reed, P. (2012). preparing urban school leaders: What works? Planning & Changing, 43(1/2), 72. Retrieved from https://www-proquest-com.library.capella.edu/docview/1506941176?pq-origsite=summon.
Peet, M. (2012). Leadership transitions, tacit knowledge sharing and organizational generativity, Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(1), pp. 45-60. Retrieved from https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/13673271211198936/full/html
Royse, D., Thyer, B. A., & Padgett, D. K. (2016). Program evaluation: An introduction to an evidence-based approach (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage.
Senge, P. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York, NY: Doubleday.