Order this Paper
Length: 400 words
Bennett and Royle argue that, far from having a merely “decorative” function, “figuration is fundamental to our world, to our lives” (“Figures and Tropes” 82). Keeping this sentence in mind, explain two (2) tropes/figures of speech in one of the stanzas from the Merchant of Venice below, and relate these lines to larger conceptual ideas of sexual difference or racial difference.
- If to do were as easy as to know what were good to do, chapels, had been churches, and poor men’s cottages princes palaces. It is a good divine that follows his own instructions; I can easier teach twenty what were good to be done, than be one of the twenty to follow mine own teaching. The brain may devise laws for the blood, but a hot temper leaps o’er a cold decree—such a hare is madness the youth, to skip o’er the meshes of good counsel the cripple. But this reasoning is not in the fashion to choose me a husband. O me, the word ‘choose’! I may neither choose who I would, nor refuse who I dislike, so is the will of a living daughter curbed by the will of a dead father. Is it not hard […] that I cannot choose, nor refuse none (7)?
- I pray you think you question with the Jew. You may as well go stand upon the beach And bid the main flood bate his usual height; You may as well use question with the wolf Why he hath made the ewe bleat for the lamb; You may as well forbid the mountain pines To wag their high tops and to make no noise When they are fretten with the gusts of heaven; You may as well do anything most hard As seek to soften that—than which what’s harder?— His Jewish heart. Therefore I do beseech you Make no more offers, use no farther means, But with all brief and plain conveniency Let me have judgement, and the Jew his will (69).
CRITERIA | UNSATISFACTORY (0-49) | SATISFACTORY (50-64) | GOOD (65-74) | VERY GOOD (75-100) |
Addressing the set question/topic in a clear and relevant way | Does not adequately address the question or the response is not sufficiently clear/coherent | A reasonable response to the question but only addresses some of the relevant issues | Clear and apt response; demonstrates a good understanding of relevant issues | Very clear and apt response; demonstrates a strong understanding of the issues |
Quality of the textual analysis | Does not engage in sufficiently close detail with the set passage/texts | A sound analysis of the set passage and related texts but the close reading could be further developed/more sustained | A detailed and informed analysis of the set passage and related texts in relation to the topic | An in-depth and sophisticated analysis of the set passage in relation to the broader text/s and topic. |
Quality of written expression | Does not meet minimum literary standards. ALL ESSAYS IN THIS CATEGORY WILL FAIL | Reasonably well written but some problems with grammar/structure/ clarity; and/or numerous spelling or typographical errors | Well written and structured; few grammatical, spelling or typographical error | Very well written; logically structured; few or no grammatical, spelling or typographical errors |