
1. Analyse critically and reflect on the application of
theoretical models relating to mentoring/coaching
and observation to practical context.
2. Critically examine the characteristics associated
with the role of coach/mentor.
Assessment weighting 30%
Word count (if relevant) 900 words (+/-10%)
Assessment task details – provide a description of the task
Assessment One (Case Study 30%) Submit by Monday of Week 5 at 13:00 UK
time.
Initiate the mentoring of a professional colleague or new member of staff against a
negotiated ‘need; over a period of three sessions. Record the process and evaluate the
effectiveness of the model (s) adopted and strategies employed. 900 words (+/-10%)
This assessment aligns with Module outcomes 1 and 2.
1. Analyse critically and reflect on the application of theoretical models relating to
mentoring/coaching and observation to practical context.
2. Critically examine the characteristics associated with the role of coach/mentor.
If you are not currently in a setting where this is feasible then the mentoring can be of
somebody not in education. Central to this assignment is your reflection of the
mentoring you experience and your targets moving forward.
This first assignment should define the nature of your mentoring approach based on
academic theory, and outline the methodologies you wish to adopt within this mentoring
case study.
Consider the following key questions to assist with this assignment:
Which models did you consider for this journey? Reasons for the use of model
and reasons for not considering other models?
How will/has this model supported the mentoring journey?
What evidence from your mentoring journey so far links to the
strengths/weaknesses of this mentoring model?
Submission instructions – What should be the format of the submission? / Where
should it be submitted?
A single Word document only, containing your assignment and a reference list.
Font should be Arial, Calibri is similar, size 11 or 12
Lines should be spaced at 1.5.
Please submit online via the appropriate Turnitin submission on the module
space.
Hints and tips
Plan your time!
You have a lot to get through on this module and being organised is essential.
Make sure that you spend time familiarising yourself with the assignment tasks,
deadlines and marking rubrics and then get started.
Leave yourself at least a day to edit and review your assignment before
submitting it. Reading it out loud can be helpful, or ask someone else to cast an
eye over it for typos if you can.
Plan your work!
You have 900 words to write for this assignment, so you need to be very clear
about the arguments that you want to make. Systematic engagement with
theoretical concepts is a must at this level of writing so make sure you have
completed your reading and participated in all of the learning activities.
Marking Rubric and Harvard Referencing
Please make sure you read the marking rubric for the module and take the time
to check the presentation of all citations and references included in your work.
Marking and moderation
All work is second marked and moderated internally. A sample of work is then
reviewed by an external examiner.
Your work will be assessed using the framework and criteria included in your
Module Handbook.
Employability Skills Applied
On successful completion of this module, a student will have had opportunities to
demonstrate achievement of the following Employability Skills:
CORE ATTRIBUTES
Engaged x
Creative x
Enterprising
Ethical x
KEY ATTITUDES
Commitment x
Curiosity x
Resilient
Confidence x
Adaptability x
PRACTICAL SKILLSETS
Digital fluency x
Organisation x
Leadership and team working x
Critical thinking x
Emotional intelligence x
Communication x