Community Health Nursing Intervention Assignment
________________________________________
Overview:
In Assignment Three, you will analyze and integrate findings of the two previous assignments. These are the Windshield Survey, including the informant interviews, and the Community Health Statistical Analysis. From these sources of information, you will establish a community health nursing care plan.
This assignment is due by Saturday, 23:59 PM of Module 3.
Directions:
The steps you will follow in this assignment are comparable to the development of a Nursing Care Plan. The main difference is that the point-of-impact is a community, an aggregate of people, versus an individual. For this assignment you will analyze and integrate the findings of your windshield survey, information from key informants, and your community health statistical analysis. This analysis and integration will help you establish a community health nursing plan of care.
This assignment requires that you take the following steps:
If you do NOT use this template there will be a 10- point grade penalty, and you will be required to resubmit with 48 hours or a zero will be given.
1. Introduction: You will state the PURPOSE of your paper. You will also provide a brief synopsis of your community and present two CHN from your observations and the statistical data from the previous two assignments. You will include key supporting evidence for the two CHN diagnoses.
2. Select ONE Diagnosis/problem based on the two (2) CHN Diagnoses you developed in Week 2 OR a newly developed CHN diagnosis based on Coach feedback from your two (2) CHN diagnoses in Assignment 2.
• Discuss the rationale for selecting this problem/Diagnosis.
• Provide supporting community and scientific evidence, for example, Healthy People 2020, Center for Disease Control (CDC), American Heart Association (AHA), and others for this diagnosis.
3. Develop a plan of nursing intervention.Explain the intervention time line. Remember to be realistic when setting the goals and the time line for the various intervention activities to take place.
• Describe the Goals (minimum of 2) and objective (2-3 PER goal) of the CHN nursing intervention. Remember, goals are where you want to go. Objectives are how you plan to accomplish the goals. Goals and objectives need to be realistic.
• Explain the intervention objective time line. This time line needs to be realistic.
• Include your plan of intervention activities and evaluation measures. The evaluation should measure the outcomes of your intervention. Be specific.
4. Summary and conclusions: Summarize your assessment findings, your proposed community health nursing intervention, and the community public health outcomes that you anticipate as a result of the intervention. This can be one or two brief paragraphs
5. References: Follow APA guidelines
6. All APA writing guidelines apply. Refer to the APA on-line resources , as needed. https://apastyle.apa.org/ (Links to an external site.)
Follow all rubric information carefully to complete this assignment successfully. Refer to the Rubric in the Assignment Submission area to view grading criteria.
If you have any questions about this assignment, please consult your Academic Coach.
Submission Instructions:
1. Save the template to your Desktop with the filename, “yourname_CH Nursing Intervention.” Insert your name in place of “yourname.”
2. Submit your assignment to Canvas.
This assignment is due by Saturday, 23:59 PM of Module 3.
Rubric
Community Health Nursing Intervention
Community Health Nursing Intervention
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntro 8 pts 8 pts
Accomplished
Clearly provides a synopsis of the community and states the purpose of the paper Clearly presents TWO CHN Dx from the previous assignments (Windshield and Community Stats) Multiple references of observations, key informant reports and or statistical data collected clearly supports the TWO CHN Dx and data sources are cited 8 to >7.0 pts
Full Credit 7 to >6.0 pts
Proficient
Provides synopsis of community and states the purpose of the paper. Identifies two CH Nursing Dx but is not clear Key data is relevant but may not fully support two CH Nursing Dx but one or two data sources are not cited 6 to >5.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Synopsis is weak and purpose of paper lacks depth or detail. Identifies one CH Nursing Dx. Key data does not fully support two CH Nursing Dx or missing support for one of the dx but multiple data sources are not cited 5 to >0 pts
Not Acceptable
Synopsis and Purpose of paper is weak or missing. Does not identify any CH Nursing Dx. Data is misinterpreted or does not support either CH Nursing Dx or no/minimal data sources are cited
8 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCHN DX (10 pts) Selection of CH Nursing Dx (2 pts) Rationale and Supporting Evidence (8 pts) 10 pts
Accomplished
Clearly and concisely identifies priority CH Nursing Dx. Provides definitive rationale for why issue is a priority Provides supporting community and scientific/authority evidence (i.e. Healthy People 2020, CFC, AHA, etc.) for this Dx and data sources are cited 10 to >9.0 pts
Full Credit 9 to >8.0 pts
Proficient
Identifies CH Nursing Dx Provides adequate rationale for why issues are a priority Evidence is relevant but may not fully support priority CH Nursing Dx but one or two data sources are not cited. 8 to >7.0 pts
Needs Improvement
CH Nursing Dx is unclear Rationale for why issues are a priority is vague or underdeveloped. Evidence not fully support priority CHN Dx or either community or scientific evidence is missing but multiple data courses are not cited. 7 to >0 pts
Not Acceptable
Does not identify any CH Nursing Dx. There is not rationale for why issues are a priority Evidence is misinterpreted or does not support the CHN dx or or no/minimal data sources are cited.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCH Nursing Intervention (44 pts) Goals and objectives 16 pts, Intervention objectives timeline 12 pts, Intervention activities and evaluation measures 16 pts 44 pts
Accomplished
Clearly and distinctly describes 2 Goals and 2-3 Objectives for each goal is appropriate. Goals and Objectives are measurable Goals and objectives are realistic for a CH nurse to implement. Intervention objectives have a clear and realistic timeline Intervention activities are clear and appropriate. Each activity has a responsible person identified with a realistic completion date Provides clear, relevant measurable evaluation mechanisms 44 to >43.0 pts
Full Credit 43 to >34.0 pts
Proficient
Describes 2 Goals and 2-3 Objectives are present but could be strengthened. Most goals and objectives are measurable. Most goals and objectives are realistic for a CH nurse to implement. Intervention objectives have a realistic timeline. Intervention activities are present but could be strengthened. Most activities have a responsible person identified with a realistic completion date Provides general evaluation mechanisms but provides limited or unclear supporting details or are not measurable 34 to >33.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Description of 1-2 goals and 1-3 objectives are vague or needs to be clarified. Several goals or objective are not measurable Several goals and objectives are not realistic for a CH nurse to implement. Intervention objectives are not clear or the timeline is unrealistic Intervention activities are present but could be strengthened. Some activities have an inappropriate responsible person identified or an unrealistic completion date Evaluation mechanisms are vague or are not measurable. 33 to >0 pts
Not Acceptable
Discussion of 1-2 goals and 1-3 objectives are overly vague, incomplete, inaccurate or missing. Goals and objective are not measurable Goals and objectives are not realistic for a CH nurse to implement. Intervention objectives are missing or the timeline is unrealistic Intervention activities are vague, inaccurate or missing. Activities do not have a responsible person identified or the completion date is unrealistic or missing Evaluation mechanisms are weak, inaccurate, incorrect, or include no details.
44 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary and Conclusions 8 pts 8 pts
Accomplished
Summary is clear concise and complete. Conclusions are accurate, logical, and based on the collected data. All data sources are cited. 8 to >7.0 pts
Full Credit 7 to >6.0 pts
Proficient
Summary is complete. Conclusions are based on the collected data. One or two data sources are not cited. 6 to >5.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Summary is vague. Conclusions are based on data but are weak. Multiple data sources are not cited. 5 to >0 pts
Not Acceptable
Summary is missing. Conclusions are in accurate or missing. No/minimal data sources are cited.
8 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting and APA (10 points) 1. Write out abbreviations the first time 2. Write out numbers 0-10 and # at the beginning of a sentence 3. Do not use contractions, 4. Correct Spelling, 5. Correct Punctuation, 6. Correct Grammar, 7. Correct sentence structure, 8. Correct in text citations 9. Clarity of writing and 10. Writing is objective/non-biased/ and professional/formal 10 pts
Accomplished
No mistakes in Writing and APA Format or Style (correct use of caps, abbreviations and numbers and no contractions; correct grammar, sentence structure, punctuation, in text citation, and references; writing is professional, clear and objective without bias/judgmental terms) 10 to >9.0 pts
Full Credit 9 to >7.0 pts
Proficient
One or two mistakes in Writing and APA Format or Style 7 to >6.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Three or four mistake in Writing and APA Format or Style 6 to >0 pts
Not Acceptable
Five or more mistakes in Writing and APA Format or Style. No Reference page if a ref pg is needed.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCitations (10 pts) Complete and accurate initial and subsequent in text citations 10 pts
Accomplished
Complete and accurate initial and subsequent in text citations 10 to >9.0 pts
Full Credit 9 to >7.0 pts
Proficient
Missing 1-2 citations. Lacking 1-3 subsequent citations. 7 to >3.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Missing 3-4 citations. Lacking 4-5 subsequent citations. 3 to >0 pts
Not Acceptable
Five or more missing citations.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReference Page (10 pts) Complete and accurate reference page if needed 10 pts
Accomplished
Complete and accurate reference page 10 to >9.0 pts
Full Credit 9 to >7.0 pts
Proficient
1-2 minor errors on reference page (2nd and subsequent lines not hang indented, format not correct for article/website/etc., not double spaced, etc.) 7 to >5.0 pts
Needs Improvement
3-5 minor errors on reference page (2nd and subsequent lines not hang indented, format not correct for article/website/etc., not double spaced, etc.) If personal communication is on the reference page -5 pts 5 to >0 pts
Not Acceptable
No reference page if a reference page is needed -10 pts
10 pts
Total Points: 100