assignment paper

Posted on by

For this field experience, you will assess students, provide them feedback, and reflect on the summative assessment implementation.

Part 1: Assessment

In the previous field experience, you designed and implemented a lesson that provided additional learning support to the selected group of students. In the final part of the assessment process, you will conduct a summative assessment for the same group of students.

Your summative assessment should be designed to determine mastery of identified standards. Prior to completing the assessment, review the pre-assessment to ensure appropriate concepts are measured in the final assessment. Once your summative assessment is complete, ask your mentor teacher to review it for approval.

Administer the assessment to the group of students. You may provide multiple assessment methods (oral, written, technology driven, etc.), and differentiate assessment based on the needs of the students.

Part 2: Provide Feedback

Individually review each student’s assessment results with him or her. During each conference, ask the following questions to engage the student:

  • How do you feel about the lesson?  
  • What was most difficult?
  • What was easy?

During this time, provide effective, descriptive feedback that starts with a positive strength of each student and ends with identifying instructional goals for the student to continue working on.  

Part 3: Reflection

Submit a 250-500 word reflection of your experience creating a summative assessment, implementing it, and providing feedback. Did the data you collected in the pre-assessment help you prepare an applicable summative assessment? What challenges did you run into during the summative assessment and how did you deal with them? Explain how you will use this process in your future professional practice.

Submit a description or copy of your assessment, along with a 250-500 word reflection on giving instructional feedback to the students, as one deliverable.

APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

  • Rubic_Print_Format

    Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
    ELM-550 ELM-550-O501 Clinical Field Experience D : Assessment and Feedback 25.0
    Criteria Percentage No Submission (0.00%) Insufficient (69.00%) Approaching (74.00%) Acceptable (87.00%) Target (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
    Content 100.0%
    Assessment 30.0% Not addressed. Assessment is incomplete, is poorly developed, and is insufficient for assessing identified social studies standards. Assessment is complete, but is underdeveloped and does not fully assess identified social studies standards. Assessment is adequately developed and designed in order to assess mastery of identified social studies standards. Assessment is proficiently and thoughtfully developed and designed in order to assess mastery of identified social studies standards.
    Reflection and Feedback 30.0% Not addressed. Summary and reflection weakly or inaccurately describe the benefits and implications of providing descriptive, effective feedback following assessment. Summary and reflection include an overly simplified description of the benefits and implications of providing descriptive, effective feedback following assessment. Summary and reflection include a sufficient description of the benefits and implications of providing descriptive, effective feedback following assessment. Summary and reflection includes a thorough and comprehensive description of the benefits and implications of providing descriptive, effective feedback following assessment.
    Future Implications 10.0% Not addressed. Conclusions and applications to future practice are inappropriate or not related to assignment. Many aspects of format are missing or mistaken. Conclusions and applications to future practice are lacking in detail of development as a professional. Some aspects of format are missing or mistaken. Conclusions and applications to future practice are thoughtful and reflect growth and development as a professional. All required aspects of format are correct within the submission. Conclusions and applications to future practice are insightful and clearly reflect growth and development as a professional. All required aspects of format are correct within the submission.
    Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 30.0% Not addressed. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistent language or word choice is present. Sentence structure is lacking. Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. Varieties of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging.
    Total Weightage 100%