

Assessment 1
As indicated earlier in this module guide, the assessment for this module comprises a 2500 word report assignment (50% of the module mark) and a 2 hour examination (50% of the module mark).
Assessment 1 – 2500 word assignment (in report format)
TASK DETAILS:
Assessment Brief 2017/2018
|
|
Assessment title |
A critical report on aspects of international human resource management practices
|
|
|
Assessed intended learning outcomes
|
On successful completion of this assessment, you will be able to:
Knowledge and Understanding
On completion of the module students will be able to:
Transferable/Key Skills and other Attributes On completion of the module students will be able to:
1. Acquire and develop a range of cognitive and intellectual skills relevant to the management of human resources in transnational organisations across different national settings 2. Develop cognitive skills in critical thinking and analysis 3. Locate, analyse and synthesise information from a range of published literature and electronic sources, with acknowledgement and referencing of sources 4. Capacity for independent and self-managed learning, as well as working in small groups, to clarify objectives, exchange ideas and knowledge, and evaluate data in terms of problems presented 5. Communicate effectively, both orally and in writing using a range of appropriate media/technology 6. Relate skills to future learning needs and employment requiring the exercise of personal responsibility and decision-making
|
Weighting within module |
This assessment is worth 50% of the overall module mark. |
Task details and instructions |
Choose an appropriate authentic national organisation (from any country) that you feel has the potential to internationalise. Assuming the role of an external HR consultant produce an appropriately formatted report for the owners of your selected organisation. Drawing on relevant theory and academic evidence, critically analyse and address the following points related to the internationalisation of human resource management practices. 1. Brief introduction to the organisation stating why you think they should internationalise (5 marks) 2. An overview of the distinction between HRM practices and International HRM practices (5 marks) 3. Issues around the utilisation of expatriate employees (20 marks) 4. The variety of training systems in different national contexts (20 marks) 5. The variety of employee voice mechanisms in different national contexts (20 marks) 6. The variety of reward systems in different national contexts (20 marks) 7. A summary of the implications of pursuing convergent and divergent HRM systems in an international context (10 marks)
|
Word count/duration (if applicable) And other guidance
|
· Your report should not exceed 2500 words. The amount of words you use for each section should be roughly aligned with the marking scheme for each section · When thinking about the structure of the report consider those who will be reading it i.e. the organisations owners · You may include figures, graphs, charts and tables where appropriate but you must include headings and labels · Please include a title and contents page (including clear reference to any tables or figures). You should also number your pages. · References are not included in the word count.
|
Marking criteria/scheme |
Marks for your assessment will be allocated based on….
(1-9) Extremely Poor
No relevant knowledge demonstrated. No appropriate themes identified. No demonstration of critical evaluation or synthesis. Fails to link theory to practice. Little discernible structure, extremely poor progression and clarity. Extremely poor use of language/ grammar. No references or attempt to provide evidence of sources used. No presentation of results
(10-19) Very Poor
Virtually no relevant knowledge demonstrated. Very poor identification of key themes. No meaningful critical evaluation evidenced. Arguments presented are inappropriate and poorly linked. Fails to adequately demonstrate links between theory and practice. Very poor structure, very poor progression and clarity. Very poor use of language / grammar. Lack of ability to source adequate material. Very poor referencing. Very poor presentation of results with major omissions.
(20-29) Poor
Inconsistent or inaccurate knowledge. Poor identification of key themes and assignment is largely descriptive. Occasionally evidences attempts to evaluate material but lacks critical approach. Confusion and/ or weakness in academic argument. Limited and inappropriate or inaccurate links between theory and practice. Disorganised in relation to structure and progression and assignment lacks clarity. Poor use of language/ grammar. Poor use of reference material with frequent error. Inappropriate or out dated sources with numerous referencing errors.
(30-39) Unsatisfactory
Limited evidence of knowledge. Unsatisfactory identification of key themes and the assignment is mainly descriptive. Evidence of critical evaluation is inconsistent throughout. Inappropriate links between theory and practice. Limited in relation to structure, logical progression and clarity. Inconsistencies in use of language/ grammar. Unsatisfactory referencing with frequent error. Limited ability to support content with relevant sources. Limited presentation of results with many omissions.
(40-49) Adequate
Basic knowledge with occasional inaccuracies. Superficial depth or limited breadth with adequate identification of key themes. Critical evaluation as is synthesis adequately evidenced, although this is limited. Some appropriate academic argument although not well applied and lacking in clarity. Appropriate yet basic integration of theory and practice. Adequate academic style. Adequate in relation to structure, logical progression and clarity. Some inconsistencies in use of language/ grammar Narrow range of sources is evidenced. Referencing in presented work is adequate with some inconsistencies or inaccuracies. Adequate presentation of results. Some omissions, errors, or lack of clarity exist.
(50-59) Fair
Mostly accurate knowledge with satisfactory depth and breadth. Fair identification of key themes. Sound critical evaluation is evidenced and relevant academic argument provided. Demonstrates basic ability to synthesise information in order to formulate appropriate questions and conclusions. Integration of theory and practice is evidenced Acceptable academic style. Fair in relation to structure, logical progression and clarity. Few inconsistencies in use of language/ grammar. Fair range of sources identified with appropriate referencing and few inaccuracies. Reasonable presentation of results.
(60-69) Good
Consistently accurate knowledge with appropriate depth and breadth. Good identification of key themes. Clear, in depth critical evaluation and academic argument with synthesis of different ideas and perspectives. Clear and relevant application of theory to practice. Good academic style. Well presented in relation to structure, logical progression and clarity. Very few inconsistencies in use of language/ grammar Good range of sources. Well referenced, very few inaccuracies. Good presentation or results.
(70-79) Very Good
Comprehensive knowledge demonstrating very good depth. Demonstrates ability to transfer knowledge between different contexts appropriately. Very good analysis and synthesis of material with evidence of critique and independent thought. Balanced and mature approach to reflection used to enhance practice and performance within a range of contexts. Clear insight into links between theory and practice. Very good academic style. Very well presented in relation to structure, logical progression and clarity. No inconsistencies in use of language/ grammar. Very good presentation of results.
(80-89) Excellent
Demonstrates the complexity of knowledge and its relevance in a variety of contexts. Excellent critical evaluation and synthesis. Arguments handled skilfully with imaginative interpretation of material. Aware of and able to critically integrate various perspectives. Coherent and systematic application of theory to practice. Demonstrates a scholarly style in relation to structure, logical progression and clarity. No inconsistencies in use of language/ grammar. Excellent presentation of results.
(90-100) Outstanding
Outstanding knowledge. Theory used to formulate new questions, ideas or challenges. Outstanding critical evaluation and synthesis. Incorporates evidence of original thinking. Able to evaluate and critically integrate various perspectives. Excellent awareness of operation within scope of practice. Outstanding scholarly style in relation to structure, logical progression and clarity. No inconsistencies in use of language / grammar. Synthesis of reference material from a wide range of sources both within and across professions Exceptional presentation of results.
You should consult your Blackboard Module site for detailed grade or mark descriptors.
|
Penalties for exceeding word count/duration |
Minimum word count: 2200 Maximum word count: 2800
*References and appendix are not included in the word count.
Please note, the penalty for not meeting or exceeding the work count by +/- 10% will be 5 marks.
|
Feedback arrangements |
Summative Feedback
You can expect to receive feedback on your final submission: Week commencing 30th April 2017
Formative Feedback
I will provide feedback on a single A4 side bulleted plan of your assignment providing this has been submitted no later than Week 6 (5th March 2018 by 4pm). The feedback will be comments and pointers to help guide you as you prepare your final submission.
Please note I will not be providing feedback on full draft assignments.
We will have a dedicated workshop (week 5 – TBC) mid-semester to address any questions you have and of course you can attend my weekly drop-in hours or student consultation hours. It would be useful if you would email in advance to book an appointment.
|
Support arrangements |
You can obtain support for this assessment during the guided study sessions and at the end of each lecture.
You may also come to my drop-in hours which are Tuesday 2-4pm and Thursday 10am to 12pm. You can also email or call me to discuss your assignments. Please allow up to 3 working days for a response.
askUS The University offers a range of support services for students through askUS.
Academic Misconduct The University takes all forms of academic misconduct seriously. This includes plagiarism, asking someone else to write your assessment for you or taking notes into an exam. You can find out how to avoid academic misconduct here.
Assessment Information If you have any questions about assessment rules, you can find out more here.
Personal Mitigating Circumstances If personal mitigating circumstances may have affected your ability to complete this assessment, you can find more information about personal mitigating circumstances procedure here.
Personal Tutor/Student Progression Assistant If you have any concerns about your studies, contact your Personal Tutor or your Student Progression Assistant.
|
Reassessment |
If you fail your assessment, and are eligible for reassessment, you will be notified by the school office.
I will arrange additional support sessions in the period before your resubmission. This will include online support via Blackboard and a face to face meeting to discuss your resubmission.
Your assessment is not eligible for in year retrieval. |
Normal
0
false
false
false
EN-GB
X-NONE
X-NONE
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-parent:””;
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin-top:0cm;
mso-para-margin-right:0cm;
mso-para-margin-bottom:8.0pt;
mso-para-margin-left:0cm;
line-height:107%;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:”Calibri”,sans-serif;
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-bidi-font-family:”Times New Roman”;
mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;
mso-ansi-language:EN-GB;}
table.MsoTableGrid
{mso-style-name:”Table Grid”;
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-priority:59;
mso-style-unhide:no;
border:solid windowtext 1.0pt;
mso-border-alt:solid windowtext .5pt;
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-border-insideh:.5pt solid windowtext;
mso-border-insidev:.5pt solid windowtext;
mso-para-margin:0cm;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:”Calibri”,sans-serif;
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-bidi-font-family:”Times New Roman”;
mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;
mso-ansi-language:EN-GB;}