This is a two-part assignment.
Part 1-
Create an informed consent form, 500 words,that you might use in practice. Find some examples or templates from https://cirt.gcu.edu/?search=consent+form or http://www.who.int/rpc/research_ethics/informed_consent/en/.
Part 2 –
Find someone who is willing to have the informed consent applied. In 250-500 words, reflect on how the experience of going through the informed consent went:
- Describe what changes you would you make to your informed consent? What would you have to clarify more?
- What ethical guidelines influenced your informed consent?
- How did you describe the privacy/billing practices to them? Discuss what changes you might make for that portion of the discussion.
- What questions did the client have during the process? Describe how you addressed them?
Include three to four scholarly references.
You will turn in both your reflection and informed consent form, see “How to Turn In Multiple Documents” under the resources tab; click course resources.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.
Benchmark Information
This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competency:
MS Psychology, Life Coaching
5.5: Apply ethical guidelines and standards.
Rubic_Print_Format
| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points | |||||
| PSY-610 | PSY-610-O500 | Coaching Philosophy | 90.0 | |||||
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less than Satisfactory (74.00%) | Satisfactory (79.00%) | Good (87.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 70.0% | |||||||
| Coaching philosophy including lens on motivates change and awareness/alignment of values and objectivity | 15.0% | Coaching philosophy including lens on motivates change and awareness/alignment of values and objectivity is absent. | Coaching philosophy including lens on motivates change and awareness/alignment of values and objectivity is weak or unfocused. | Coaching philosophy including lens on motivates change and awareness/alignment of values and objectivity is adequate. | Coaching philosophy including lens on motivates change and awareness/alignment of values and objectivity is appropriate and attempts to make connections. | Coaching philosophy including lens on motivates change and awareness/alignment of values and objectivity is clear and demonstrates complete understanding of all characteristics. | Please see comments on paper. | 13.50/13.50 |
| Describe how psychological theory applies to your personal coaching philosophy. | 15.0% | Description of how psychological theory applies to your personal coaching philosophy is absent. | Description of how psychological theory applies to your personal coaching philosophy is vague or underdeveloped. | Description of how psychological theory applies to your personal coaching philosophy is adequate. | Description of how psychological theory applies to your personal coaching philosophy provides relevant information. | Description of how psychological theory applies to your personal coaching philosophy is thorough and well supported. | Please see comments on paper. | 13.50/13.50 |
| Discuss how the philosophy aligns with the foundational ideals or overarching concepts found in the text. | 15.0% | Discussion of how the philosophy aligns with the foundational ideals or overarching concepts found in the text is absent. | Discussion of how the philosophy aligns with the foundational ideals or overarching concepts found in the text is simple or lacking information. | Discussion of how the philosophy aligns with the foundational ideals or overarching concepts found in the text is adequate. | Discussion of how the philosophy aligns with the foundational ideals or overarching concepts found in the text has sound information. | Discussion thoroughly understands and explains how the philosophy aligns with the foundational ideals or overarching concepts found in the text. | Please see comments on paper. | 13.50/13.50 |
| Describe the strengths and challenges of the foundation ideals or overarching concepts. | 15.0% | Description of the strengths and challenges of the foundation ideals or overarching concepts is absent. | Description of the strengths and challenges of the foundation ideals or overarching concepts is vague or underdeveloped. | Description of the strengths and challenges of the foundation ideals or overarching concepts is adequate. | Description of the strengths and challenges of the foundation ideals or overarching concepts provides relevant information. | Description of the strengths and challenges of the foundation ideals or overarching concepts is thorough and well supported. | Please see comments on paper. | 13.50/13.50 |
| Discuss what strategies you would take to ensure your philosophy aligns with client needs. | 10.0% | Discussion of what strategies would ensure the philosophy aligns with client needs is absent. | Discussion of what strategies would ensure the philosophy aligns with client needs is simple or lacking information. | Discussion of what strategies would ensure the philosophy aligns with client needs is adequate. | Discussion of what strategies would ensure the philosophy aligns with client needs has sound information. | Discussion thoroughly understands and explains what strategies would ensure the philosophy aligns with client needs. | Please see comments on paper. | 9.00/9.00 |
| Organization and Effectiveness | 20.0% | |||||||
| Thesis Development and Purpose | 7.0% | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. | Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. | Please see comments on paper. | 6.30/6.30 |
| Argument Logic and Construction | 8.0% | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. | Please see comments on paper. | 7.20/7.20 |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | Please see comments on paper. | 4.50/4.50 |
| Format | 10.0% | |||||||
| Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 5.0% | Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. | Please see comments on paper. | 4.50/4.50 |
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. | Please see comments on paper. | 4.50/4.50 |
| Total Weightage | 100% | 90.00/90.0 |