Developing Countries

Please use Switzerland as your developed country and Ethiopia as your developing country.
For this project you will pose as a real estate agent who is trying to sell two countries, one is a developing nation and the other is a nation that is already
developed. You will use the two countries you chose in week 4. You are going to create TWO listings one for each of your countries. You are a good realestate agent and have done your research on your clients. You know your clients are only interested in environmental issues faced by each country. You also
have researched the countries you are trying to sell. You must include resources and cite everything using APA citations. **Use only reliable sources, not
Wikipedia**
1) The first paragraph for each of your countries, corresponds with the information presented in chapter 15 of your textbook. Please write a paragraph
describing each country’s access to clean fresh water. Include in your descriiption any problems with water availability and water quality. (2) Your second
paragraph for each country corresponds with the information presented in chapters 17 and 14 of your textbook. In your second paragraph for each country,
please describe issues your countries have with the production of pollution, toxins, or health hazards. Please include what controls are in place for the
production, treatment, or disposal of toxic and or hazardous materials.
Discussion Forum Grading Rubric
Peer-to-Peer Interaction
No posts were made.
[0 points]
Submitted primary post with no interaction with peer or instructor.
[1 point]
Engaged in a meaningful and relevant dialog with at least one peer and/or instructor.
[3 point]
Engaged in a meaningful and relevant dialog with two or more peers and/or instructor.
[5 point]
Classroom Participation
No posts were made.
[0 points]
N/A – no points are available for this criterion.
[1 point]
Contributed to the forum on one day.
[3 point]
Contributed to the forum on at least two or more days.
[5 point]
Content Relevance
No posts made as replies to peers and/or instructor, and/or contributions are not relevant to the discussion, and/or no posts meet the minimum 50-words
requirement.
[0 points]
Posts to the forum were limited in content related to the forum’s primary topic. Terminology was routinely used incorrectly. There was insufficient support for
ideas, opinions, and other attempts to justify claims. Several posts were less than 50 words in length.
[1 point]
All posts were reasonably clear and connected to the primary topic of the forum, but some terminology was used incorrectly and/or attempts to validate
reasoning and opinions were sometimes flawed. Some posts were less than 50 words in length.
[3 point]